Sunday, February 14, 2010

AN EMBEZZLEMENT OF COPYWRITEN MATERIAL


Recent Up Dates to an Ongoing Battle of Deciet and Embezzlement of Sophia Stewart's copywritten work.

This is in response to the Wall Street Journal Article dated February 4th 2010 titled - Terminator is Actually a Drama - attached for your review are Liens filed by Stewart pursuant to this matter. We are in possession of material evidence to break this story.California Judge Margaret M. Morrow has already received the following 1 Minute and 45 Seconds and the Articles of Incorporation that was hidden.When you see this brief discussion, you will see an example of what can happen to a person that has a correct legal position when artful techniques are used to mislead a federal judicial official. Notwithstanding the fact that the first minute and 45 seconds of the film read exactly on the copyright of the writer, and the person that claimed ownership of the remainder did not claim to own that portion of the film, and the matter was in evidence through her copyright and her opponent claimed to have started the company when she had no story on the same day she referred to in the film, May 12th, every aspect of the representatives for the defendants failed to disclose this matter to the federal judge in a proper context. Then the defendant used that material misrepresentation to achieve summary judgment under rule 56 which should have been impossible when the true creator had the first copyright and film dialogue that read on her work that the so-called owners did not claim in their copyright submission. This is a story that has intrigue, betrayal, misconduct, abuse of the legal system, and a curious inability to perceive the harm to the original creator, an African American writer.

This website has a clear presentation of facts that can not be denied. It is worth your review. - http://wwwthedivineoraclesophia.blogspot.com/

Please review all information carefully.

We look forward to communication regarding this matter.

In Reference to Cameron’s entertainment lawyer Burt field’s comments, “that all of the pictures that he [Cameron] created are totally his own, original work,” and that “He [Cameron] hasn’t taken anything from anybody, including her”, we respectfully submit the following: ______________ _______________

Best Regards,



§18 U.S.C. 4

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

§18 U.S.C. 3

Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

1 MINUTE AND 45 SECONDS

HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT

Part I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUY6E-ByYVs

Part II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLyJuMWttE4

Part III: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH8viFxZLy4

-A Hovercraft of immense proportions enters the scene with the most advanced computer oriented laser guided weapons known to the post nuclear world.

-A man pops up from nowhere and begins to run as his friend hopes that he make it.

-Still, with precision, the computer generated robot focuses, aims, and disperses his atom relationships so as to mystify his very existence.

-Terminator open with a post nuclear darkened war scene canvassed by robots controlled through computer chips with laser-guided weapons in or about 2010 to 2030 A.D.

-What’s critical to understand here, is that this 1 minute and 45 second description of a nuclear war in Terminator do not appear anywhere in the script written by James Cameron and Gale Anne Hurd.

-Yet, the words and the “post nuclear war” comes verbatim from Sophia Stewart’s the Third Eye.

“The proposed science fiction film deals with Earth during the year 2110 A.D. By that time planet Earth had experienced horrible nuclear wars…” “The 22nd Century will be a time in which Earth will have experienced many computerized nuclear wars, and for the first time in history, the people of earth will feel the ultimate nuclear war that will bring universal death.”

-The Third Eye Movie Treatment by Sophia Stewart

“This willful failure to disclose Stewart’s contribution makes Cameron’s and Hurd’s copyright registration invalid…for willfully failing to reveal that the substantial contributing author was omitted with the intent to deny her royalties in the project."

“The year 2110 A.D. brought many great changes on Earth. Mankind just finished experienced the last of the Atomic Age, when evolution of awareness began; and man was going from the unconscious stages of evolutionary development in to the conscious levels of it. There was no doubt earth would be destroyed.”

–Quotations from “The Third Eye” by Sophia Stewart

“Yet, on a reading of Stewart’s "Third Eye as copyrighted 81’, 83’ and 84’, it is undeniable that the first 1 minute and 45 seconds of Terminator came from that discussion and that it is totally excluded from the copyright submission of Cameron and Hurd to the Copyright Office.”

“He entered Earth’s atmosphere in a flash of brilliant light;”

“After the energy, he lies naked and still…”

–The Third Eye by Sophia Stewart

“The technique of taking the script and sending it through a “chop shop” so that many of its features are changed while unpublished and then bringing it forth as a published work is described as infringement in Dezendorf v. Twentieth Century Fox. Yet, it is plainly present in the movie. This is evidence that Gale Anne Hurd had consciousness of the wrongfulness of this activity and did not want it to be said that she wrote exactly what was written in Stewart’s treatment. [TXU 117-610 COPYRIGHT] The May 1, 1981 treatment is covered by copyright registration number Txu 117-610 in the name of Sophia Stewart. This is evidence of a theft of the script, knowing unauthorized use of it, and an intent to deny Stewart of her share of the profits associated therewith”.

Kyle Reese: “What day is it? The date!”

Cop in Alley: “12th... May…”

Sophia Stewart completed the six-page treatment of the Third Eye on May 1, 1981. It was forwarded to the Vice President of Creative Affairs of Fox before May 7, 1981. Surprisingly, Gale Anne Hurd, then the public relations and marketing director of New World Productions under Roger Corman (who had never produced a film), started Pacific Western Productions on May 12, 1981.

Kyle Reese: “What day is it? The date!”

Cop in Alley: “12th... May…”

- May 12, 1981-

Is it simply coincidence, that Gale Ann Hurd started Pacific Western Productions on the same day Kyle Reese began his search for Sarah Conner? Or, is this the M/O of an Embezzlement of copywritten material? Allegations of "criminal copyright infringement" must be evidenced by: “Access” “Copying” & “Substantial Similarity” to a protected literary work.In relation to Terminator; Ms. Sophia Stewart, former USC Film student, has evidenced all three.

As Recently as December 2009, Twenty-Two year old Samantha Tumpach was taping portions of her sister's surprise party at a local theater and accidentally captured some scenes of the film “New Moon” on her digital camcorder. Although Samantha insisted she was not trying to record the new release on purpose, she was arrested for “criminal use of a motion picture exhibition” - a criminal statue intended to curb piracy by deterring movie watchers from recording movies in theaters and selling “bootlegged” copies. Initially, Samantha faced up to three years in prison. Fortunately for Tumpach, she only spent two-days in jail following her arrest.

If Law Enforcement protects the rights of Billion dollar corporations, shouldn’t Law enforcement also protect the rights of citizens?

While young movie watchers are being jailed for accidentally capturing a few scenes of a film; the Stewart case is shining the light on white collar crime sweeping America. Stewart uncovered a white collar theft of her protected literary work, its embezzlement and how that was used as a means to conceal the crime and escape punishment.

What’s critical to remember, is that the 1:45 description of a nuclear war in Terminator do not appear anywhere in the script written by James Cameron and Gale Anne Hurd. No “post nuclear war” was revealed in any draft done by James Cameron including the draft from June of 1982. Without any “post nuclear war” revealed by Cameron’s scripts, why does a Terminator travel through time to kill Sarah Conner? And what does Kyle Reese have to protect Sarah Conner from? Nevertheless, the words, “nuclear war” and the element of “time travel” come verbatim from Sophia Stewart’s copywritten material - The Third Eye.

The act of trying to conceal unauthorized use of someone’s protected literary work, “hidden in plain sight” of a newly released film, is the weakest link in the chain of criminal copyright infringement. [Terminator & Reese] To be caught with copywritten “source material” that bears no resemblance to the film or movie it is based upon, is to catch a thief with a smoking gun. [James Cameron T2]

Once again, it’s for good reason that thieves don’t register stolen property without changing the appearance of what was stolen. These “changes” and “alterations” are premeditated measures used to escape detection and consequence. Likewise, this pattern of theft is consistent with child kidnappers who are known by law enforcement to shave the heads or otherwise “alter” the appearance of children they abduct. Nevertheless, a mother will always recognize her baby. [Stewart Quote]

“If someone steals your car and puts it through a chop shop, (where the crooks add or take away from it) trying to make it their own, is it still your car? Do you go out and buy another car to prove yours was stolen?” –Sophia Stewart, Legal Owner of the Matrix & the Terminator

AN EMBEZZLEMENT OF COPYWRITEN MATERIAL

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Thursday, December 10, 2009

-The Smoking Gun- The 1:45 Terminator Introduction



The film opens with a post nuclear darkened war scene canvassed by robots controlled through computer chips with laser-guided weapons in or about 2010 to 2030 A.D. A hovercraft of immense proportions enters the scene with the most advanced computer oriented laser guided weapons known to the post nuclear world. A man pops up from nowhere and begins to run as his friend hopes that he make it. Still, with precision, the computer generated robot focuses, aims, and disperses his atom relationships so as to mystify his very existence.



Then the insert on the screen wrote these unscripted words: “The machines rose from the ashes of the nuclear fire. Their war to exterminate mankind had raged for decades, but the final battle would not be fought in this time. It would be fought here, in our present tonight.” (Exhs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, The Third Eye)



This description does not appear anywhere in the script written by James Cameron. Yet, the words and the post nuclear war came from MY SOURCE WORK. This was not revealed in any draft done by James Cameron including the draft from June of 1982.



Sophia Stewart completed the six-page treatment of the Third Eye on May 1, 1981. It was forwarded to the Vice President of Creative Affairs of Fox before May 7, 1981. Surprisingly, Gale Anne Hurd, then the public relations and marketing director of New World Productions under Roger Corman who had never produced a film, started Pacific Western Productions on May 12, 1981.



The first minute and 45 seconds of the film includes visual dialogue that is not written into the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth draft of the screenplay.



In the April 29, 2005 Motion for Summary Judgment submitted to the Court by Bruce Isaacs of Beverly Hills, he did not disclose to the court the following facts:



1) that the first minute and 45 seconds of the film does not read on the screenplay by Cameron and Hurd;

2) that the first minute and 45 seconds of the film does read on the treatment by Sophia Stewart dated May 1, 1981;

3) that the May 1, 1981 treatment was sent to Fox before May 7, 1981;

4) that the May 1, 1981 treatment was transferred from Fox to Roger Corman of New World Pictures prior to May 9, 1981;

5) that Gale Hurd, Corman's assistant, started Pacific Western Productions on May 12, 1981 while James Cameron was in Italy and did not know about the May 1, 1981 treatment;

6) Cameron was required to play along with Hurd to get the opportunity to write and direct the project based upon Stewart's work product.

(ABSOLUTE FRAUD!!!)




If Law Enforcement protects the rights of corporations, shouldn't Law Enforcement protect the rights of citizens?

The Stewart case shines a light on white collar crime now sweeping America. Stewart uncovered a sophisticated theft of her protected literary work, its embezzlement and how that was used as a means to conceal the crime and escape repercussions. For Instance: “This willful failure to disclose Stewart’s contribution makes the copyright registration invalid under 18 U.S.C. 1001 for willfully failing to reveal that the substantial contributing author was omitted with the intent to deny her royalties in the project. Yet, on a reading of the "Third Eye" as copyrighted on February 2, 1983, it is undeniable that the first minute and 45 seconds came from that discussion and that it is totally excluded from the copyright submission of Cameron and Hurd to the Copyright Office. The technique of taking the script and sending it through a chop shop so that many of its features are changed while unpublished and then bringing it forth as a published work is described as infringement in Dezendorf v. Twentieth Century Fox. Yet, it is plainly present in the movie. This is evidence that Hurd had consciousness of the wrongfulness of this activity and did not want it to be said that she wrote exactly what was written in Stewart’s treatment. The May 1, 1981 treatment is covered by copyright registration number Txu 117-610 in the name of Sophia Stewart. This is evidence of a theft of the script, knowing unauthorized use of it, and an intent to deny Stewart of her share of the profits associated therewith”.

The FBI recently admitted that the epidemic of Mortgage fraud spread across America is born from the "lending industry" itself not borrowers. Is the "film industry" itself any different? If so, why did a Warner Brothers Attorney named Judy Neulak inform Stewart that she (Neulak) knew for a fact, that Warner Brothers had used Stewart's protected literary work? Why is Warner Brothers & Fox permitting the sale of images of "The Matrix" and "The Terminator" with Stewart's book "The Third Eye" on amazon.com (since 2005) without suing Stewart for copyright infringement? - http://www.amazon.com/Third-Eye-Mother-Matrix/dp/0978539648 Who will explain the fact that the alleged creator's scripts BEAR NO RESEMBLEMCE to what's on screen in both sets of Terminator and Matrix films? Due to a lack of “source material” - did Cameron, Hurd & the Wachowski’s get caught hiding stolen source material in the plain sight of the movies themselves?
For a good reason, thieves don’t register what they steal without an attempt to fraudulently alter the 'make and model' of what was stolen. These “Alterations” are actually “calculated measures” used to escape detection and repercussions. Likewise, this pattern of theft is consistent with child kidnappers who are known by law enforcement to shave the heads and/or otherwise “alter” the appearance of children they abduct in order to (1) keep their parents from ever recognizing them and (2) escape repercussion. Nevertheless, a good mother will always recognize her baby.

“If someone steals your car and puts it through a chop shop, (where the crooks add or take away from it) trying to make it their own, is it still your car? Do you go out and buy another car to prove yours was stolen?”

–Sophia Stewart, Legal Owner of the Matrix & the Terminator



Saturday, November 28, 2009

Major Script language Associated with Infringement #2




Draft in Development

Terminator
Main Titles – Chapter One
Arrival of the Terminator Chapter Two
A1 Title Sequence – Slitscan Effect A1

Fifth Draft
March 11, 1984
March 19, 1984 revision pages

By James Cameron with Gale Anne Hurd

[This description is evidence of the intent of the parties to engage in willful copyright infringement within the meaning of 17 U.S.C. 506 (e).]

Gradually the sound of distant traffic becomes audible.
A low angle bounded on one side by a chain link fence and on the other by the one-story public school buildings.

Spray can hieroglyphics. A Los Angeles public school in a blue-collar neighborhood.

Angle between school buildings, where a trash dumpster looms in a low angle. A cat crosses frame.

Close on CAT, which freezes, alert, sensing something just beyond perception.

A source less wind rises, and with it a keening WHINE.
Papers blow across the pavement.
The cat YOWLS and hides under the dumpster.
Windows rattle in their frames.
The Whine intensifies, accompanied now by a wash of frigid purple light. A concussion like a thunderclap right overhead blows in all the windows facing the yard.

C.U. – C.A.T., its eyes are wide as the glare dies.

1A/FX Angle – Dumpster 1A/FX

Electrical discharges arc from the dumpster to a water faucet and climb a drainpipe like a Jacobs’ ladder.

2 EXT. School yard – Night 2

Slow Pan as the sound of stray electrical crackling subsides.
Frame comes to rest on the figure of a naked man kneeling, faced away, in the previously empty yard.
He stands slowly.
This man is in his late thirties, tall and powerfully built, moving with graceful precision.

He is the TERMINATOR.

Actual depiction of the introduction of the Terminator Film does not include the cat, the war scene, or the statement overlay.

Description observed by the writer.

The film opens with a post nuclear war darkened war scene canvassed by robots controlled through computer chips with laser-guided weapons in or about 2010 to 2030 A.D. A hovercraft of immense proportions enters the scene with the most advanced and computer oriented laser guided weapons known to the post nuclear world. A man pops up from nowhere and begins to run as his friend roots that he make it. Still, with precision, the computer generated robot focuses, aims, and disperses his atom relationships so as to mystify his very existence.

Then the insert from the screen wrote these words:

The machines rose from the ashes of the nuclear fire. Their war to exterminate mankind had raged for decades, but the final battle would not be fought in this time. It would be fought here, in our present tonight.

This description does not appear any where in the script written by James Cameron. Yet, the words and the post nuclear war came from some source. This was not revealed in any draft done by James Cameron including the draft from June of 1982.

Sophia Stewart completed the six-page treatment of the Third Eye on May 1, 1981. It was forwarded to the Vice President of Creative Affairs of Fox before May 5, 1981. Surprisingly, Gale Anne Hurd, then the public relations and marketing director of New World Productions under Roger Corman who had never produced a film, started Pacific Western Productions on May 12, 1981. The only thing that she could have had was the embezzled treatment of Sophia Stewart. How do we know this?

The description above that constitutes the first minute and 45 seconds of the film does not come from the script written by James Cameron with Gale Hurd. Instead, it reads on the language of the “Third Eye” that was written by Sophia Stewart on May 1, 1981. The copyright is Txu-116-610.

The copyright filed by Cameron and Hurd is subject to nullification under 18 U.S.C. 1001 for willfully failing to disclose their use of Stewart's stolen treatment.

Sophia Stewart copyrighted the May 1, 1981 treatment in February of 1983. Gale Hurd and James Cameron therefore had a duty to identify her work as a derivative contribution in paragraph 6 of the related copyright application. Did they do that?

Their copyright registration on February 3, 1984 says, “No.”

Its material features are as follows:

Registration Number: Pau-584-564
Authors: James Cameron and Gale Ann Hurd
Description: 129 pages
Note: Screenplay
Claimant: Hemdale Film Corp.
Created: 1983 [first registered screenplay by Cameron alone with writer’s guild in July of 1982 thereby making copyright registration knowingly false]
Author on © application: Gale Ann Hurd, as employee for hire of Pacific Western Productions. [However, Hurd was the sole stockholder of the entity started on May 12, 1981 that seemed to operate with the script embezzled from Fox without the knowledge, consent, or approval of Sophia Stewart, the creative force behind the writing of the Third Eye.]

Sophia Stewart, then a USC film student, did not know that Gale Hurd, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate from Stanford, had secured her script by improper means and developed a Public Relations campaign to make it appear that the concept and plot design came totally from Cameron and Hurd. This willful failure to disclose Stewart’s contribution makes the copyright registration invalid under 18 U.S.C. 1001 for willfully failing to reveal that the substantial contributing author was omitted with the intent to deny her royalties in the project. Yet, on a reading of the "Third Eye" as copyrighted on February 2, 1983, it is undeniable that the first minute and 45 seconds came from that discussion and that it is totally excluded from the copyright submission of Cameron and Hurd to the Copyright Office.

The technique of taking the script and sending it through a chop shop so that many of its features are changed while unpublished and then bringing it forth as a published work is described as infringement in Dezendorf v. Twentieth Century Fox.

Yet, it is plainly present in the movie. This is evidence that Hurd had consciousness of the wrongfulness of this activity and did not want it to be said that she wrote exactly what was written in Stewart’s treatment. The May 1, 1981 treatment is covered by copyright registration number Txu 117-610 in the name of Sophia Stewart. This is evidence of a theft of the script, knowing unauthorized use of it, and an intent to deny Stewart of her share of the profits associated therewith.

Phil Banks

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Sophia Stewart’s former lawyers Are Part Of Fraud.


“HAD the evidence, hid it & did not submit it in the california COURTS”
What evidence?

-The “Terminator” & “Matrix” movies already in the attorney’s possession
-600 Pages of probative evidence
-*Constructive Trust Pacific Western Productions
(*The shell company that produced the 1:45sec [verbatim] out of Stewart’s 81 Third Eye Movie Treatment)
-*The articles of Incorporation with the Secretary State of California
-*The names of Attorneys who constructed the Trust
-Lubell’s Confession, Forged Admissions and other documents
-Perjury Affidavits of all the Defendants, Bruce Isaacs & John Shulaman
-Stewart’s copywritten Movie Treatment and manuscript (81, 83, & 84)
-“The Third Eye” book itself
What Pedigree lawyer on case worth BILLIONS of dollars is going to fumble routine legal tasks; such as submitting crucial evidence to win a case? Since when did lawyers cease the desire to make money? When did news become so one sided? Why is Sophia Story being “blacked-out” of the mainstream media? Why hasn’t Main Stream media Contacted Sophia Stewart to hear her side of the story? Madoff’s story did not get back yard coverage. Sophia Stewart’s story is the Bernie Madoff of Hollywood worth BILLIONS! Is the media paid off?
A band of corrupt Attorneys charged Sophia Stewart, Legal Owner of The Matrix & Terminator, $50,000.00 (U.S. dollars) only to sabotage her entire California civil case by withholding the submission of the most critical evidence. We know now why Sophia Stewart did not appear in California court: She was bared and gagged from doing depositions and appearances.
According to New York District Attorney Thomas Warnom, Bureau Chief, Special Prosecutions Bureau, Stewart’s former attorney Jonathan Lubell received “a sentence of One to Three Years in August of 2005”. Jonathan Lubell confessed to have forgered Stewart’s Admissions (among other documents), all by himself without anyone else's help. Not one of Sophia Stewart’s former lawyers had the integrity to inform Stewart of the fact that Jonathan Lubell was convicted and serving time, due to forgery and grand larceny, while working Stewart’s Billion dollar case. Jonathan Lubell’s confession & conviction is an Automatic Default judgment. Sophia Stewart has won both cases! Therefore, a convicted attorney Jonathan Lubell along with, Michael Stoller (indicted for fraud), Dean Webb (cited for rambling) and Gary Brown (indicted for fraud) represented a “cavalry of corruption” that rode in to sabotage Stewarts multi-Billion dollar Civil Case in California Courts. Again, since when did lawyers cease the desire to make money? Sophia paid her former lawyers $50,000.00 (U.S. dollars) to do their jobs as attorney’s & officers of the court, not “saboteurs” working as “the loyal opposition” behind their clients back.
If Sophia Stewart wasn’t telling the truth, there would be no reason for a “cavalry of corruption” to perpetrate over 30 counts of fraud & perjury. Judge Brooke C. Wells ruled that the 30 counts of Fraud and Perjury stand as of August 11th 2009. And as you know two sentences of fraud over turns & wins a case because a Judge can not aid & abet in a criminal scheme.
If you own something, you don’t need a “fake deed” because you have the real one.
Sophia Stewart has the real copyrights to the Matrix and the Terminator; therefore she is the legal owner.
Fraud is used to hide the truth, never to compliment it.

SOPHIA STEWART : THE CORRECT FACTS


Its one thing that life and the experiences of our trials and tribulations teach us all,and that is our Christ consciousness shall always prevail in what the purpose of true integrity means when we are honest within ourselfs.Below you shall see the email conversations between Sophia Stewart The Mother of the Matrix,Terminator and Mr Bruce Isaacs the defendants attorney from her first case that was intentionally frauded and Sabotage by the accused in this cover up that could actually become a blockbuster movie within the eventual outcome of the truth finally coming to the light for Sophia Stewart.

Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 6:07 PM

Bruce Isaacs,
I reserve the right to have a jail cell available for you, the Defendants, & my former lawyers for all the fraud and perjury you put in the California Court. My former lawyers had the evidence, hid it, and did not submit it.
This was the only way for you to get a phony judgment. Beside the fraud, my 81' copyrighted treatment wins the case period. This is the reason it was hidden from Judge Morrow, and never submitted.
The confession letter of Jonathan Lubell put all of you in jail. He has already done the actionable fraud. You reserved your rights by taking my rights from me!
Today, right now, I am taking my rights back!
Now " you have the right to remain silent, anything more you have to say will be held against you in a court of law. This is including your emails, your lying Declaration, the fraudulent liens ( with the phony $300, 000 dollar judgment ) which you entered illegally against me, the rightful owner & Writer of the Matrix & Terminator, in the California, Utah, & Nevada courts.
My emails are not lies, they are the truth, nothing but the truth so help me God!
I did not get my day in court because you , the Defendants, and my former lawyers fix the California Court by entering fraud, perjury, baring & gaging me, and hiding the evidence.
These are the correct facts.
I won both of my cases because of all the fraud & perjury. Two sentences of fraud over turns & wins a case. A Judge can not aid & abet in a criminal scheme!
Your emails are false, defamatory, & actionable.
The only rights that you can reserve now, are the rights to pay or go to jail!
The media have a right to examine the evidence and the people have a right to know the truth---
Sophia Stewart
Writer of Matrix & Terminator
The legal Owner
On Thu, 11/12/09, Bruce Isaacs wrote:

From: Bruce Isaacs
Subject: RE: RE: SOPHIA STEWART FLYER
To: "sophia stewart" , "David Bias" <biashdavid@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Jackie Hawthorne" , "Taaj" <secretary@diasporarestoration.org>, "Glenda Gill" , "Glenda Taylor" , "T Angelo" , "Jim Petzke" , "Kathy" , "Kate Chilton" , chuchu4444@aol.com, "Peter Mott" <mrpetermott@aol.com>, "Stanley Lewis" <3dmovies@gmail.com>, "Bruce Isaacs"
Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 9:31 AM

Ms. Stewart:

This is my last e-mail to you.

Your e-mails are wrong.

You got your day in court. You lost.

Those are the facts.

Your e-mails are false, defamatory and actionable.

We reserve all rights.

I will have no more communications with you. This matter is over and done.

Bruce Isaacs

Bruce Isaacs,Esq.

Wyman & Isaacs, LLP

5757 Wilshire Blvd. , Suite 475

Los Angeles, CA 90036

ph: (323) 648-4144; fax (323) 648-4133

bisaacs@wymanisaacs.com


From: sophia stewart [mailto:sophiastewart10@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 10:14 PM
To: David Bias
Cc: Jackie Hawthorne; Taaj; Glenda Gill; Glenda Taylor; T Angelo; Bruce Isaacs; Jim Petzke; Kathy; Kate Chilton; chuchu4444@aol.com; Peter Mott; Stanley Lewis
Subject: Fw: RE: SOPHIA STEWART FLYER



--- On Thu, 11/12/09, Eduardo Michon Small wrote:


From: Eduardo Michon Small
Subject: RE: SOPHIA STEWART FLYER
To: "'sophia stewart'"
Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 1:07 AM

Sophia Stewart's crooked ass lawyers actually HAD THE EVIDENCE, HID THE EVIDENCE & DIDN'T SUBMIT THE EVIDENCE.

What evidence?

A Manuscript, Screen Treatment, Graphics, copywritten material 81', 83', & 84, Terminator and Matrix films where NEVER SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE BY SOPHIA STEWARTS ATTORNEY'S

What Pedigree lawyer on case worth Billions of dollars is going to fumble routine legal tasks such as submitting crucial evidence to win a case?

Since when did lawyers cease the desire to make money?

Her Lawyers "had it", 'hid it" and "didn't submit it".

Outright fraud committed.


From: sophia stewart [mailto:sophiastewart10@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:52 PM
To: Bruce Isaacs
Cc: Kathy; Taaj; E_Small
Subject: RE: SOPHIA STEWART FLYER

Bruce Isaacs,

Put me to the test! I dare you. File a lawsuit and prove your clients wrote it. All of your asses are going to jail for fraud and perjury. I will prove to the media with my evidence that you and my former lawyers fixed the California Court Case. You hid my 1981 copy written treatment from Judge Morrow and all of you ( Defendants ) lied under oath. You tried to prove independent creation by lying that James Cameron's 1982 movie treatment came before my 1983 book. He had no 1982 treatment, just assignments to the dubby company called Pacific Western Production which was part fraud and part law ,that dubby company produced the one minute and 45 seconds out of my 81 Third Eye movie treatment! One minute and 45 second is verbatim in the Terminator's & Matrix's introductions. I have all the names of the lawyers that created this shell company. This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that James Cameron and the Wachowskis Brothers never wrote the Terminator nor the Matrix.

My former lawyer Jonathan Lubell have confessed in a letter that he forgered my Admissions ( among other documents ) , all by himself without anyone else's help. That fraud alone overturns the California Case and wins me the Utah.! Plus Lubell went to jail for fraud on another case while he was committing fraud on my case for over a year. You cannot fix fraud and perjury. Get over it... I want my credit and I want my money , or you damn sure going to jail , every last one of you and that is a promise.

Sophia Stewart

Writer of the Matrix & Terminator---

On Wed, 11/11/09, Bruce Isaacs wrote:


From: Bruce Isaacs
Subject: RE: SOPHIA STEWART FLYER
To: "sophia stewart"
Cc: "Kate Chilton" , "Kathy" , "Jim Petzke" , "Bruce Isaacs"
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009, 10:05 PM

Dear Ms. Stewart:

Your statements are false and actionable.

We reserve all rights.

bi

Bruce Isaacs,Esq.

Wyman & Isaacs, LLP

5757 Wilshire Blvd. , Suite 475

Los Angeles, CA 90036

ph: (323) 648-4144; fax (323) 648-4133

bisaacs@wymanisaacs.com



From: Eduardo Michon Small [mailto:e_small@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:15 PM
To: Bruce Isaacs; 'Sophia Stewart'
Subject: RE: RE: SOPHIA STEWART: THE CORRECT FACTS

Mr. Isaacs will you be filing a lawsuit to prove Sophia Stewart’s email is “false, defamatory and actionable”?

From: Bruce Isaacs [mailto:bisaacs@wymanisaacs.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:23 PM
To: Eduardo Michon Small; Sophia Stewart
Subject: RE: RE: SOPHIA STEWART: THE CORRECT FACTS


I do not know who you are.

Bruce Isaacs,Esq.

Wyman & Isaacs, LLP

5757 Wilshire Blvd. , Suite 475

Los Angeles, CA 90036

ph: (323) 648-4144; fax (323) 648-4133

bisaacs@wymanisaacs.com

From: Bruce Isaacs [mailto:bisaacs@wymanisaacs.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:34 PM
To: Eduardo Michon Small; Sophia Stewart
Subject: RE: RE: SOPHIA STEWART: THE CORRECT FACTS


I’m waiting for you to identify yourself. If you refuse to do so, I see no point to answering your question.

Bruce Isaacs,Esq.

Wyman & Isaacs, LLP

5757 Wilshire Blvd. , Suite 475

Los Angeles, CA 90036

ph: (323) 648-4144; fax (323) 648-4133

From: Eduardo Michon Small [mailto:e_small@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:50 PM
To: Bruce Isaacs; 'Sophia Stewart'
Subject: RE: RE: SOPHIA STEWART: THE CORRECT FACTS

Mr. Isaacs, if you’re telling the truth, my identity is of no consequence.

Will you be filing a lawsuit to prove Sophia Stewart’s email is “false, defamatory and actionable”?

From: Bruce Isaacs
Subject: RE: RE: SOPHIA STEWART: THE CORRECT FACTS
To: "Eduardo Michon Small" , "sophia stewart"
Date:
Friday, November 13, 2009, 6:53 PM

Done. Goodbye. Bruce Isaacs

Bruce Isaacs,Esq.

Wyman & Isaacs, LLP

5757 Wilshire Blvd. , Suite 475

Los Angeles, CA 90036

ph: (323) 648-4144; fax (323) 648-4133

bisaacs@wymanisaacs.com

From: Sophia Stewart [mailto:sophiastewart10@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 4:01 PM
To: Bruce Isaacs - Warner Brothers Attorney
Subject: RE: RE: SOPHIA STEWART: THE CORRECT FACTS

Bruce Isaacs, No this not done, it is just the beginning.

Sophia Stewart

Writer of the Matrix & Terminator, Legal Owner

This email is going to go around the world a billion times!